Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S1200pj front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Nikon S1200pj
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.8) lens
  • 186g - 107 x 64 x 23mm
  • Launched August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S1200pj, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S1200pj (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S1200pj (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M320 was brought out 3 years earlier than the S1200pj and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the M320 matches up versus the S1200pj with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S1200pj

 M320 S1200pj 

Reasons to pick Nikon S1200pj over the Kodak M320

 S1200pj M320 
LaunchedAugust 2011January 2009Fresher by 31 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S1200pj

 M320 S1200pj 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 offers physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S1200pj has sizing of 107mm x 64mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 186 grams (0.41 lbs).

See the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S1200pj in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 versus the S1200pj.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and S1200pj is 95 and 93 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and S1200pj.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Nikon S1200pj will provide extra detail having its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older M320 will be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Nikon S1200pj
19
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
28
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography info
Nikon S1200pj Street photography info
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (155 grams)
54
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (186 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Nikon S1200pj Sports photography factors
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
35
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
slow frames per second (0.8 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography info
Nikon S1200pj Travel photography info
50
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (155 grams)
sensor resolution low (9MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
61
good MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (186 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography information
Nikon S1200pj Landscape photography information
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
42
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Nikon S1200pj
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (155g)
29
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition (186g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S1200pj Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon S1200pj
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix S1200pj
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Nikon
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix S1200pj
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2011-08-24
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.9-5.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 0.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 pounds) 186g (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 107 x 64 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 EN-EL12
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 or 2 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $39 $499