Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b01ea/b01eaeed3344757bf3c3addea44dbc596dcfee8a" alt="Kodak EasyShare M320 front Kodak EasyShare M320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14c26/14c26813ba805670eb48a77334820e84b88d961f" alt="Nikon Coolpix S220 front Nikon Coolpix S220 front"
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Released February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the S220 (10MP) is very comparable but the M320 (1/2.5") and S220 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The M320 was launched within a month of the S220 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M320 scores vs the S220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Nikon Coolpix S220. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M320 Gallery & Nikon S220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S220
M320 | S220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Kodak M320
S220 | M320 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S220
M320 | S220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 features exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S220 has dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the M320 against the S220.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1201/b1201c00fcb53f0e05e64728131fbe44aada0a70" alt="Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 size comparison Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and S220 is 95 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d7ec/3d7ecd39bd68ec8bc16ed19c0869eb34460671a6" alt="Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 top view buttons comparison Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and S220.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M320 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Nikon S220 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8608/c8608d17cd0267c6987712a3655ad6636cc3939c" alt="Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 sensor size comparison Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 sensor size comparison"
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f1e4/5f1e4cb4584199d2650c531dd01f57a5bec13dce" alt="Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S220 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-03 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 2000 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 100 grams (0.22 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | EN-EL10 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $39 | $56 |