Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S220 front
Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Nikon S220
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
  • Released February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the S220 (10MP) is very comparable but the M320 (1/2.5") and S220 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was launched within a month of the S220 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M320 scores vs the S220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S220

 M320 S220 
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Kodak M320

 S220 M320 

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S220

 M320 S220 
ReleasedJanuary 2009February 2009Same age
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 features exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S220 has dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the M320 against the S220.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and S220 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and S220.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M320 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Nikon S220 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Nikon S220
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW files
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography advice
Nikon S220 Street photography advice
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition (155 grams)
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography details
Nikon S220 Sports photography details
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography information
Nikon S220 Travel photography information
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (155g)
low MP (9MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
52
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography highlights
Nikon S220 Landscape photography highlights
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
Nikon S220 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition (155 grams)
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon S220
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix S220
General Information
Make Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix S220
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2009-02-03
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 2000
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.1-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 100 grams (0.22 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (3 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $39 $56