Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S3700 front
Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
32
Overall
40

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2009
Nikon S3700
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
  • 118g - 96 x 58 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2015
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Nikon. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S3700 (20MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S3700 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M320 was unveiled 7 years prior to the S3700 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the M320 matches up against the S3700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S3700

 M320 S3700 

Reasons to pick Nikon S3700 over the Kodak M320

 S3700 M320 
RevealedJanuary 2015January 2009Newer by 73 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S3700

 M320 S3700 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 provides physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S3700 has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the M320 and the S3700.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and S3700 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and S3700.

To sum up, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M320 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Nikon S3700 will resolve more detail having an extra 11MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Nikon S3700 Portrait photography details
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
39
decent megapixels (20MP)
supports face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography advice
Nikon S3700 Street photography advice
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography features
Nikon S3700 Sports photography features
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect auto focus
51
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery pack (240 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography info
Nikon S3700 Travel photography info
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (155g)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
better than average battery pack (240 CIPA)
decent megapixels (20MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Nikon S3700
22
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
44
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
better than average battery pack (240 shots)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Nikon S3700 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
32
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone support
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S3700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon S3700
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix S3700
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Nikon
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix S3700
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2015-01-14
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 5152 x 3864
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-200mm (8.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.7-6.6
Macro focusing range 10cm 2cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 2.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 118g (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 96 x 58 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7001 EN-EL19
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $39 $175