Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Launched August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6400, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S6400 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S6400 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M320 was manufactured 4 years before the S6400 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M320 scores vs the S6400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Nikon Coolpix S6400. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery and Nikon S6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S6400
| M320 | S6400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Kodak M320
| S6400 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 44 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6400
| M320 | S6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M320 provides outer measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S6400 has specifications of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the M320 against the S6400.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and S6400 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and S6400.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Nikon S6400 will give you extra detail due to its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6400 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Nikon |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.1-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $39 | $500 |