Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Olympus E-510 front
Portability
69
Imaging
44
Features
42
Overall
43

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced November 2007
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-510
  • Superseded the Olympus E-500
  • New Model is Olympus E-520
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak M320 and Olympus E-510, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the E-510 (10MP) is pretty similar but the M320 (1/2.5") and E-510 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M320 was revealed 14 months after the E-510 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the M320 grades against the E-510 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus E-510

 M320 E-510 
AnnouncedJanuary 2009November 2007Newer by 14 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Kodak M320

 E-510 M320 
Manually focus Very precise focus

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus E-510

 M320 E-510 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 provides exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-510 has measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Check the Kodak M320 and Olympus E-510 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the M320 vs the E-510.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and E-510 is 95 and 69 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and E-510.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M320 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-510 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern M320 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Olympus E-510
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
56
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Olympus E-510
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than others in class (155g)
68
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than others in class (490 grams)
screen is fixed
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-510 Sports photography highlights
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
52
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography details
Olympus E-510 Travel photography details
50
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (155g)
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
52
lighter than others in class (490g)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-510 as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
55
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (2.5")
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Olympus E-510
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than others in class (155g)
9
no video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M320 vs Olympus E-510 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Olympus E-510
 Kodak EasyShare M320Olympus E-510
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Olympus E-510
Other name - EVOLT E-510
Type Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2009-01-08 2007-11-23
Body design Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 25 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Amount of lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 6.3 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 490 grams (1.08 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 52
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.0
DXO Low light score not tested 442
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $39 $550