Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Kodak M320 and Olympus FE-25, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the FE-25 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the M320 (1/2.5") and FE-25 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe M320 was brought out at a similar time to the FE-25 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M320 matches up vs the FE-25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Olympus FE-25. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M320 Gallery and Olympus FE-25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus FE-25
| M320 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Kodak M320
| FE-25 | M320 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus FE-25
| M320 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak M320 features external measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus FE-25 has specifications of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 and Olympus FE-25 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the M320 against the FE-25.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and FE-25 is 95 and 98 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The image below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and FE-25.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus FE-25 will resolve more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-25 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus FE-25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus FE-25 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 3648 x 2768 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.4" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $39 | $15 |
