Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
97 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Kodak M320 and Olympus FE-3010, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and FE-3010 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and FE-3010 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M320 was brought out at a similar time to the FE-3010 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the M320 grades versus the FE-3010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Olympus FE-3010. The entire galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Olympus FE-3010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus FE-3010
| M320 | FE-3010 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Kodak M320
| FE-3010 | M320 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus FE-3010
| M320 | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 offers external dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus FE-3010 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M320 and Olympus FE-3010 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 against the FE-3010.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and FE-3010 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and FE-3010.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus FE-3010 will give greater detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak M320 vs Olympus FE-3010 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus FE-3010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus FE-3010 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 108 grams (0.24 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $39 | $140 |