Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b01ea/b01eaeed3344757bf3c3addea44dbc596dcfee8a" alt="Kodak EasyShare M320 front Kodak EasyShare M320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e45/e9e457397531c200c69a31ad07004097ef5a77b7" alt="Olympus Stylus 5010 front Olympus Stylus 5010 front"
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 5010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Kodak M320 and Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and 5010 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The M320 was revealed 12 months earlier than the 5010 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the M320 scores against the 5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Olympus Stylus 5010. The full galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery & Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus 5010
M320 | 5010 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Kodak M320
5010 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus 5010
M320 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 enjoys outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus 5010 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 and Olympus 5010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the 5010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da810/da810071423e20bb57497531dbd420a11ca658b9" alt="Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and 5010 is 95 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e35f2/e35f2010ee03e82a74c1d8d86f5b95fbae260da3" alt="Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and 5010.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M320 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus 5010 will show extra detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32a6d/32a6d068ce8340012962db8f551ae550da30a7bf" alt="Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison"
Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5a51/f5a51b0e07237fd50882d76a64ea81d415d9281d" alt="Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju 5010 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 7cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 126 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $39 | $150 |