Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Olympus Stylus 5010 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
27
Overall
32

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Olympus 5010
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju 5010
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Kodak M320 and Olympus 5010, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and 5010 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M320 was revealed 12 months earlier than the 5010 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the M320 scores against the 5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus 5010

 M320 5010 

Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Kodak M320

 5010 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2009More recent by 12 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus 5010

 M320 5010 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display measurements
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 enjoys outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus 5010 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 and Olympus 5010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the 5010.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and 5010 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and 5010.

Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M320 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus 5010 will show extra detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus 5010 Portrait photography highlights
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low resolution (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW format
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Olympus 5010 as a Street photography camera
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW format
heavier than average (155g)
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Olympus 5010 Sports photography factors
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no phase detect autofocus
39
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography info
Olympus 5010 Travel photography info
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (155g)
low resolution (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
65
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
Olympus 5010 Landscape photography advice
22
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
37
pretty wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 5010 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic socket
heavier than average (155g)
29
pretty wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Olympus 5010
 Kodak EasyShare M320Olympus Stylus 5010
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Olympus Stylus 5010
Otherwise known as - mju 5010
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2010-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 7cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 126 grams (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $39 $150