Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TG-860 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M320 was unveiled 7 years prior to the TG-860 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the M320 scores against the TG-860 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus TG-860
| M320 | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Kodak M320
| TG-860 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 74 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus TG-860
| M320 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 features outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the TG-860.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and TG-860 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and TG-860.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M320 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-860 will provide greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $39 | $279 |