Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak M320 versus Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TG-870 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M320 was announced 8 years before the TG-870 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the M320 matches up against the TG-870 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus TG-870
M320 | TG-870 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Kodak M320
TG-870 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | January 2009 | More recent by 85 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus TG-870
M320 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M320 enjoys physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Kodak M320 versus Olympus TG-870 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the M320 versus the TG-870.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and TG-870.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M320 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-870 will offer more detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 221g (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $39 | $280 |