Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
46
Overall
43

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2009
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak M320 versus Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TG-870 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M320 was announced 8 years before the TG-870 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the M320 matches up against the TG-870 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus TG-870

 M320 TG-870 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Kodak M320

 TG-870 M320 
RevealedJanuary 2016January 2009More recent by 85 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kClearer display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus TG-870

 M320 TG-870 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M320 enjoys physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M320 versus Olympus TG-870 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the M320 versus the TG-870.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and TG-870.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M320 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-870 will offer more detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography advice
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
36
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Olympus TG-870
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than average (155 grams)
65
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (221g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography factors
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
51
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
good battery pack (300 shots)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-870 Travel photography details
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than average (155 grams)
low MP (9MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
good battery pack (300 CIPA)
environment proofing
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (21mm)
more heavy than competitors in class (221g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-870 Landscape photography features
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
50
pretty wide (21mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
environment proofing
good battery pack (300 shots)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-870 Vlogging features
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than average (155g)
32
pretty wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (221 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Olympus TG-870
 Kodak EasyShare M320Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2016-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO - 12800
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 21-105mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 221g (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $39 $280