Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and VG-110 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M320 was announced 3 years before the VG-110 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M320 scores against the VG-110 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus VG-110
M320 | VG-110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Kodak M320
VG-110 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus VG-110
M320 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M320 comes with exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has specifications of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the M320 against the VG-110.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and VG-110 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and VG-110.
All in all, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VG-110 will result in extra detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Olympus VG-110 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 105g (0.23 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $39 | $150 |