Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Olympus VG-110 front
Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and VG-110 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M320 was announced 3 years before the VG-110 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M320 scores against the VG-110 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Olympus VG-110

 M320 VG-110 

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Kodak M320

 VG-110 M320 
IntroducedFebruary 2011January 2009More modern by 25 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Olympus VG-110

 M320 VG-110 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M320 comes with exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has specifications of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the M320 against the VG-110.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and VG-110 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and VG-110.

All in all, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VG-110 will result in extra detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Olympus VG-110
19
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
26
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography details
Olympus VG-110 Street photography details
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
heavier than others (155g)
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VG-110 Sports photography highlights
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect AF
24
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low battery (170 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography info
Olympus VG-110 Travel photography info
50
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (155 grams)
low MP (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
57
built-in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low battery (170 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography info
Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography info
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
27
reasonably wide (27mm)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
low battery (170 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging factors
Olympus VG-110 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic port
heavier than others (155g)
28
reasonably wide (27mm)
provides face detect focus
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Olympus VG-110
 Kodak EasyShare M320Olympus VG-110
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Olympus VG-110
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2011-02-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 3472 x 2604 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 105g (0.23 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 170 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7001 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $39 $150