Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and FP1 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and FP1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M320 was brought out 12 months earlier than the FP1 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M320 grades vs the FP1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The entire galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Panasonic FP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Panasonic FP1
M320 | FP1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Kodak M320
FP1 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Panasonic FP1
M320 | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 offers physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Panasonic FP1 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the M320 versus the FP1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and FP1 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and FP1.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M320 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic FP1 will produce greater detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $39 | $153 |