Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12
95 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Kodak M320 and Panasonic FS12, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and FS12 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and FS12 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M320 was revealed 3 months earlier than the FS12 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the M320 scores vs the FS12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Panasonic FS12
| M320 | FS12 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Kodak M320
| FS12 | M320 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Panasonic FS12
| M320 | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 |  | April 2009 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 comes with physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FS12 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 and Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the M320 and the FS12.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and FS12 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The picture underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and FS12.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Panasonic FS12 will offer extra detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $39 | $228 |