Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
14
Overall
24

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Alternate Name is PL10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 Overview

The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Kodak M320 versus Samsung CL5, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.5").

Photography Glossary

The M320 was revealed within a month of the CL5 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M320 matches up versus the CL5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung CL5

 M320 CL5 

Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Kodak M320

 CL5 M320 

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung CL5

 M320 CL5 
ReleasedJanuary 2009February 2009Same generation
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen size
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 offers outside dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

Check the Kodak M320 versus Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 and the CL5.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and CL5 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The pic below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and CL5.

As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of images although you will want to factor the release date of the cameras into account.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Samsung CL5
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
24
supports face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography details
Samsung CL5 Street photography details
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Samsung CL5 Sports photography factors
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Samsung CL5
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
low MP (9 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography factors
Samsung CL5 Landscape photography factors
22
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
22
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging factors
Samsung CL5 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic port
heavier than others in class (155g)
25
supports face detect focusing
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung CL5
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung CL5
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung CL5
Also Known as - PL10
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2009-02-23
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-4.5
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 6.3
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 141g (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $39 $391