Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung PL210 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Samsung PL210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 Overview

Below is a thorough analysis of the Kodak M320 versus Samsung PL210, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and PL210 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and PL210 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M320 was brought out 24 months prior to the PL210 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the M320 scores against the PL210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung PL210

 M320 PL210 

Reasons to pick Samsung PL210 over the Kodak M320

 PL210 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2009More recent by 24 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung PL210

 M320 PL210 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 comes with exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung PL210 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M320 versus Samsung PL210 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the M320 against the PL210.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and PL210 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and PL210.

Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M320 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung PL210 will render extra detail having its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography information
Samsung PL210 Portrait photography information
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
28
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Samsung PL210
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
heavier than others (155g)
49
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Samsung PL210 Sports photography factors
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no phase detect AF
26
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography details
Samsung PL210 Travel photography details
50
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (155g)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
very good maximum aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography factors
Samsung PL210 Landscape photography factors
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
37
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3")
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung PL210 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic support
heavier than others (155g)
27
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Samsung PL210 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung PL210
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung PL210
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung PL210
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 80 -
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) ()
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lb) -
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 100 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $39 $200