Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95
95 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
Photography Glossary Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and ST95 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M320 was released 24 months earlier than the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M320 grades against the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung ST95
| M320 | ST95 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Kodak M320
| ST95 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST95
| M320 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Kodak M320 enjoys exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the M320 vs the ST95.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and ST95.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung ST95 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung ST95 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $39 | $145 |