Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
95
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and ST95 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M320 was released 24 months earlier than the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M320 grades against the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung ST95

 M320 ST95 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Kodak M320

 ST95 M320 
ReleasedJanuary 2011January 2009More recent by 24 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST95

 M320 ST95 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Kodak M320 enjoys exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the M320 vs the ST95.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and ST95.

As you can see, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung ST95 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Portrait photography camera
18
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
29
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography info
Samsung ST95 Street photography info
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than others (155g)
50
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography advice
Samsung ST95 Sports photography advice
15
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others (155g)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Samsung ST95
21
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
37
great max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3")
MP count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST95 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone port
more heavy than others (155g)
27
great max aperture (f)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung ST95
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung ST95
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung ST95
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2011-01-19
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) -
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $39 $145