Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung TL205 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Samsung TL205
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
  • 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Also referred to as PL100
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TL205 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TL205 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M320 was announced 12 months earlier than the TL205 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the M320 matches up vs the TL205 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung TL205

 M320 TL205 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Kodak M320

 TL205 M320 
RevealedJanuary 2010January 2009More modern by 12 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL205

 M320 TL205 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 has physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 compared to the TL205.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and TL205 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and TL205.

To sum up, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung TL205 will resolve more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography info
Samsung TL205 Portrait photography info
19
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
21
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography highlights
Samsung TL205 Street photography highlights
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
heavier than others (155 grams)
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than average (177g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography information
Samsung TL205 Sports photography information
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect autofocus
25
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography advice
Samsung TL205 Travel photography advice
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than others (155 grams)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
50
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (177g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL205 Landscape photography advice
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
23
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Samsung TL205
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic jack
heavier than others (155 grams)
22
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic jack
heavier than average (177g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung TL205
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung TL205
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung TL205
Also Known as - PL100
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2010-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.0-5.6
Macro focusing distance 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.40 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lbs) 177 grams (0.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $39 $180