Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is PL150
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TL210 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TL210 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe M320 was launched 12 months earlier than the TL210 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M320 scores against the TL210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Samsung TL210. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung TL210
| M320 | TL210 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Kodak M320
| TL210 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL210
| M320 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has got physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL210 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the M320 versus the TL210.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and TL210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and TL210.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung TL210 will render more detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older M320 will be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung TL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung TL210 |
| Also called | - | PL150 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | SLB-07B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $39 | $230 |
