Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Released August 2009
  • Other Name is ST550
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Overview

Following is a extended review of the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TL225 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TL225 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

The M320 was brought out 7 months prior to the TL225 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the M320 scores against the TL225 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung TL225

 M320 TL225 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Kodak M320

 TL225 M320 
ReleasedAugust 2009January 2009More modern by 7 months
Display dimensions3.5"2.7"Larger display (+0.8")
Display resolution1152k230kSharper display (+922k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL225

 M320 TL225 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak M320 offers physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 against the TL225.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and TL225 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and TL225.

All in all, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung TL225 will offer extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Samsung TL225 Portrait photography details
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
21
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography features
Samsung TL225 Street photography features
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than others (155 grams)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch to focus
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than others (187g)
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography information
Samsung TL225 Sports photography information
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
more heavy than others (155g)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
boasts touch to focus
built-in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (187g)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography details
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse function
37
pretty wide (27mm)
lovely big screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
Samsung TL225 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than others (155g)
29
pretty wide (27mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone socket
more heavy than others (187 grams)
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung TL225
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung TL225
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung TL225
Also referred to as - ST550
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2009-08-13
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3472 x 2604 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3.5"
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 187 grams (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $39 $488