Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Other Name is ST550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TL225 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TL225 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M320 was brought out 7 months prior to the TL225 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the M320 scores against the TL225 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung TL225
| M320 | TL225 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Kodak M320
| TL225 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL225
| M320 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak M320 offers physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 against the TL225.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and TL225 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and TL225.
All in all, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung TL225 will offer extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 187 grams (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $39 | $488 |