Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
34
Features
36
Overall
34

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Also Known as WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Here is a in-depth overview of the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TL320 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TL320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M320 was released very close to the TL320 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the M320 matches up versus the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung TL320

 M320 TL320 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Kodak M320

 TL320 M320 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL320

 M320 TL320 
IntroducedJanuary 2009February 2009Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 enjoys physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the M320 versus the TL320.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and TL320.

Plainly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M320 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung TL320 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Portrait photography camera
19
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low MP (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
33
manual focus
supports face detect focusing
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography information
Samsung TL320 Street photography information
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Sports photography highlights
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect auto focus
29
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Travel photography camera
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
low MP (9MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
59
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography details
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
43
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging info
Samsung TL320 Vlogging info
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic socket
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
31
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung TL320
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung TL320
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung TL320
Otherwise known as - WB1000
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2009-02-23
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) -
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $39 $380