Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 front
Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
30
Overall
34

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Sony T110
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Kodak M320 versus Sony T110, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and T110 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and T110 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was revealed 24 months before the T110 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M320 grades versus the T110 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

				

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony T110

 M320 T110 

Reasons to pick Sony T110 over the Kodak M320

 T110 M320 
ReleasedJanuary 2011January 2009Newer by 24 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony T110

 M320 T110 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 features external measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony T110 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M320 versus Sony T110 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the M320 against the T110.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and T110 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and T110.

To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M320 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony T110 will result in more detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Sony T110 Portrait photography details
19
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
29
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography info
Sony T110 Street photography info
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than average in class (155 grams)
56
supports touch focus
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography advice
Sony T110 Sports photography advice
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Sony T110
50
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (155g)
low MP (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
68
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
Sony T110 Landscape photography features
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
38
reasonably wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging details
Sony T110 Vlogging details
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (155g)
28
reasonably wide (27mm)
touchscreen functionality
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Sony T110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony T110
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 2.80 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 121g (0.27 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BG1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $39 $199