Kodak M320 vs Sony T900
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23


96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Kodak M320 versus Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and T900 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and T900 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

The M320 was brought out within a month of the T900 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M320 scores vs the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony T900
M320 | T900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Kodak M320
T900 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony T900
M320 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 enjoys outside dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 versus Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the M320 vs the T900.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and T900.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony T900 will give more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Sony |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $39 | $300 |