Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Announced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Kodak M320 versus Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and T900 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and T900 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M320 was brought out within a month of the T900 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M320 scores vs the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony T900

 M320 T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Kodak M320

 T900 M320 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen size3.5"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.8")
Screen resolution922k230kCrisper screen (+692k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony T900

 M320 T900 
AnnouncedJanuary 2009February 2009Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 enjoys outside dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 versus Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the M320 vs the T900.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and T900.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony T900 will give more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography info
Sony T900 Portrait photography info
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
27
has manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography details
Sony T900 Street photography details
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors (155g)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Sony T900
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
24
image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography information
Sony T900 Travel photography information
50
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (155 grams)
megapixel count low (9MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
36
has manual focus
lovely big screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging details
Sony T900 Vlogging details
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (155 grams)
28
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony T900
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2009-02-17
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 143g (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $39 $300