Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
96 Imaging
39 Features
41 Overall
39
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Kodak M320 and Sony TX10, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TX10 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TX10 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M320 was released 3 years prior to the TX10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the M320 scores versus the TX10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery & Sony TX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony TX10
| M320 | TX10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX10 over the Kodak M320
| TX10 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony TX10
| M320 | TX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has outer measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony TX10 has proportions of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak M320 and Sony TX10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the M320 versus the TX10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and TX10 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and TX10.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony TX10 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Sony |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $39 | $309 |