Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
41
Overall
39

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Sony TX10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Overview

The following is a comprehensive review of the Kodak M320 and Sony TX10, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TX10 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TX10 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M320 was released 3 years prior to the TX10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the M320 scores versus the TX10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony TX10

 M320 TX10 

Reasons to pick Sony TX10 over the Kodak M320

 TX10 M320 
AnnouncedAugust 2011January 2009Newer by 31 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony TX10

 M320 TX10 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has outer measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony TX10 has proportions of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M320 and Sony TX10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the M320 versus the TX10.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and TX10 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and TX10.

As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony TX10 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony TX10 as a Portrait photography camera
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
30
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography information
Sony TX10 Street photography information
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competitors (155g)
67
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus via touch
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
Sony TX10 Sports photography highlights
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect AF
44
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography advice
Sony TX10 Travel photography advice
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (155g)
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
environment proof
boasts focus via touch
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
Sony TX10 Landscape photography details
22
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse mode
46
quite wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging features
Sony TX10 Vlogging features
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (155 grams)
34
quite wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony TX10
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10
General Information
Company Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2011-08-16
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - XtraFine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 pounds) 133 gr (0.29 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $39 $309