Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
48
Overall
44

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Overview

Lets look more closely at the Kodak M320 and Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was brought out 4 years prior to the TX200V which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M320 grades vs the TX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony TX200V

 M320 TX200V 

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Kodak M320

 TX200V M320 
ReleasedJanuary 2012January 2009Newer by 37 months
Display dimensions3.3"2.7"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony TX200V

 M320 TX200V 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak M320 has got physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M320 and Sony TX200V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the M320 compared to the TX200V.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The pic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and TX200V.

Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony TX200V will give greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Sony TX200V
19
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
36
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography advice
Sony TX200V Street photography advice
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
heavier than average in class (155g)
68
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch focus
weather proofing
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Sports photography camera
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
has no phase detect auto focus
49
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (155g)
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
weather proofing
provides touch focus
megapixel count good (18MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
Sony TX200V Landscape photography features
22
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
47
fairly wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3.3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
weather proofing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Sony TX200V
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic port
heavier than average in class (155g)
35
fairly wide (28mm)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony TX200V
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2012-01-30
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm 3cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3.3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 129 grams (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7001 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at release $39 $500