Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look more closely at the Kodak M320 and Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M320 was brought out 4 years prior to the TX200V which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M320 grades vs the TX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony TX200V
| M320 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Kodak M320
| TX200V | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony TX200V
| M320 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak M320 has got physical measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M320 and Sony TX200V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the M320 compared to the TX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The pic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and TX200V.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony TX200V will give greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $39 | $500 |