Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
46
Overall
41

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sony TX55
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
  • Revealed July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 Overview

In this article, we are reviewing the Kodak M320 versus Sony TX55, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TX55 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TX55 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M320 was introduced 3 years before the TX55 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the M320 scores versus the TX55 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony TX55

 M320 TX55 

Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Kodak M320

 TX55 M320 
RevealedJuly 2011January 2009Newer by 30 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Display sizing3.3"2.7"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony TX55

 M320 TX55 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 features exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has sizing of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") along with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).

See the Kodak M320 versus Sony TX55 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the M320 and the TX55.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and TX55 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The pic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and TX55.

All in all, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M320 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony TX55 will result in extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography information
Sony TX55 Portrait photography information
19
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
36
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Sony TX55
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than average in class (155g)
58
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography features
Sony TX55 Sports photography features
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
good battery life (250 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography details
Sony TX55 Travel photography details
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (155g)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
69
good battery life (250 CIPA)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
Sony TX55 Landscape photography advice
22
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
50
has manual focus
decently wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3.3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
good battery life (250 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony TX55 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
heavier than average in class (155g)
34
decently wide (26mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M320 vs Sony TX55 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony TX55
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2011-07-24
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus distance 10cm 3cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3.3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - XtraFine OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lbs) 109 grams (0.24 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $39 $350