Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
97 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Launched February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TX66 (18MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TX66 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M320 was announced 4 years before the TX66 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the M320 scores against the TX66 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery and Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony TX66
| M320 | TX66 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Kodak M320
| TX66 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony TX66
| M320 | TX66 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 offers exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony TX66 has measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") along with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the M320 and the TX66.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and TX66 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and TX66.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M320 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony TX66 will offer greater detail with its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX66 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 109 grams (0.24 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $39 | $350 |