Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sony W330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Kodak M320 and Sony W330, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and W330 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and W330 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M320 was launched 12 months before the W330 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the M320 grades versus the W330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony W330

 M320 W330 

Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Kodak M320

 W330 M320 
RevealedJanuary 2010January 2009Fresher by 12 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony W330

 M320 W330 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak M320 features physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony W330 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 and Sony W330 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the M320 versus the W330.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and W330 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and W330.

Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony W330 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W330 as a Portrait photography camera
19
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
28
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Sony W330
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition in class (155 grams)
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography advice
Sony W330 Sports photography advice
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
MP count decent (14MP)
low fps (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Sony W330
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (155 grams)
sensor resolution low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
65
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
Sony W330 Landscape photography features
22
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
37
rather wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W330 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (155g)
26
rather wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Sony W330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony W330
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2010-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus range 10cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lbs) 128 grams (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $39 $170