Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony W350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 Overview

Following is a detailed analysis of the Kodak M320 and Sony W350, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and W350 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and W350 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was announced 12 months earlier than the W350 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the M320 grades against the W350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony W350

 M320 W350 

Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Kodak M320

 W350 M320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010January 2009More modern by 12 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony W350

 M320 W350 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display measurements
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M320 features physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony W350 has specifications of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M320 and Sony W350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the M320 vs the W350.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and W350 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and W350.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M320 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony W350 will result in greater detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography features
Sony W350 Portrait photography features
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
28
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Sony W350
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
heavier than others in class (155g)
58
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography details
Sony W350 Sports photography details
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect auto focus
35
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Sony W350
50
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (155g)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
66
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography information
Sony W350 Landscape photography information
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
38
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W350 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic port
heavier than others in class (155g)
29
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Sony W350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony W350
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
General Information
Brand Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2010-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus range 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.80 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 117g (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $39 $200