Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sony W530
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-104mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 113g - 93 x 53 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 Overview

Here is a extensive comparison of the Kodak M320 versus Sony W530, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and W530 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and W530 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was brought out 24 months before the W530 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the M320 scores vs the W530 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony W530

 M320 W530 

Reasons to pick Sony W530 over the Kodak M320

 W530 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2009Fresher by 24 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony W530

 M320 W530 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurements
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 has got outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony W530 has sizing of 93mm x 53mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 113 grams (0.25 lbs).

See the Kodak M320 versus Sony W530 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 and the W530.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and W530 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and W530.

To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony W530 will give you more detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography information
Sony W530 Portrait photography information
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
no RAW support
28
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography highlights
Sony W530 Street photography highlights
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.5")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Sony W530
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
no phase detect auto focus
26
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W530 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
MP count low (9MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
65
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
Sony W530 Landscape photography advice
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
33
pretty wide (26mm)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging details
Sony W530 Vlogging details
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
26
pretty wide (26mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak M320 vs Sony W530 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony W530
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2011-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-104mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 113g (0.25 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 93 x 53 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch price $39 $269