Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W550 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony W550
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-104mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 110g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Launched July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 Overview

Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Kodak M320 vs Sony W550, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and W550 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and W550 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M320 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the W550 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the M320 grades versus the W550 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony W550

 M320 W550 

Reasons to pick Sony W550 over the Kodak M320

 W550 M320 
LaunchedJuly 2011January 2009More modern by 30 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony W550

 M320 W550 
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 offers outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony W550 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the M320 versus the W550.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and W550 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and W550.

As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony W550 will offer you greater detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Sony W550 Portrait photography details
19
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography details
Sony W550 Street photography details
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW format
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W550 as a Sports photography camera
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
no phase detect auto focus
35
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
low frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography info
Sony W550 Travel photography info
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
65
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Sony W550
22
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
42
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W550 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (155g)
29
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Sony W550 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony W550
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W550
General Information
Brand Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W550
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2011-07-24
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-104mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.80 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 pounds) 110 gr (0.24 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single -
Pricing at launch $39 $119