Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 front
Portability
96
Imaging
45
Features
26
Overall
37

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Sony W810
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-162mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 56 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2014
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Kodak M320 versus Sony W810, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and W810 (20MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and W810 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M320 was revealed 6 years before the W810 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the M320 grades versus the W810 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony W810

 M320 W810 

Reasons to pick Sony W810 over the Kodak M320

 W810 M320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2009More modern by 60 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony W810

 M320 W810 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 has got external measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony W810 has measurements of 97mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M320 versus Sony W810 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the M320 and the W810.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and W810 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and W810.

As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony W810 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography factors
Sony W810 Portrait photography factors
19
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
38
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography details
Sony W810 Street photography details
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competitors (155g)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W810 as a Sports photography camera
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect auto focus
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
features tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography info
Sony W810 Travel photography info
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (155g)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
megapixel count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Sony W810
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
41
pretty wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
Sony W810 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic port
heavier than competitors (155g)
32
pretty wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Sony W810 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony W810
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3472 x 2604 5152 x 3864
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 27-162mm (6.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-6.5
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.20 m (with ISO auto)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lbs) 111 grams (0.24 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 97 x 56 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7001 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $39 $100