Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 front
Portability
96
Imaging
45
Features
26
Overall
37

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony W830
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
  • 122g - 93 x 52 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak M320 and Sony W830, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and W830 (20MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and W830 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M320 was released 6 years prior to the W830 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M320 grades against the W830 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony W830

 M320 W830 

Reasons to pick Sony W830 over the Kodak M320

 W830 M320 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2009More modern by 60 months

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony W830

 M320 W830 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 comes with exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony W830 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M320 and Sony W830 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the M320 against the W830.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and W830 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and W830.

Clearly, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony W830 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Sony W830 Portrait photography details
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
38
MP count good (20MP)
supports face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Sony W830
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competition (155g)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Sony W830
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
has no phase detect auto focus
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
supports tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W830 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
MP count good (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W830 as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
41
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging information
Sony W830 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
32
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Sony W830 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony W830
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3472 x 2604 5152 x 3864
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-200mm (8.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.3-6.3
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 2.80 m (with ISO auto)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 pounds) 122g (0.27 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 93 x 52 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $39 $128