Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Announced February 2014
Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and WX220 (18MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and WX220 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M320 was manufactured 6 years before the WX220 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the M320 grades against the WX220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The entire galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony WX220
M320 | WX220 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Kodak M320
WX220 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2009 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony WX220
M320 | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 features outer measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the M320 against the WX220.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and WX220 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and WX220.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony WX220 will resolve more detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $39 | $198 |