Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front
Portability
96
Imaging
43
Features
41
Overall
42

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sony WX220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and WX220 (18MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and WX220 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M320 was manufactured 6 years before the WX220 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the M320 grades against the WX220 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony WX220

 M320 WX220 

Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Kodak M320

 WX220 M320 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2009Fresher by 62 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony WX220

 M320 WX220 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 features outer measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the M320 against the WX220.

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and WX220 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and WX220.

Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony WX220 will resolve more detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography advice
Sony WX220 Portrait photography advice
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
37
decent megapixels (18MP)
comes with face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography information
Sony WX220 Street photography information
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than average (155 grams)
59
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography advice
Sony WX220 Sports photography advice
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
46
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18MP)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX220 as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (155 grams)
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (250mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography highlights
Sony WX220 Landscape photography highlights
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
44
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Sony WX220
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
heavier than average (155g)
34
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony WX220
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2014-02-12
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-250mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.70 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 121g (0.27 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 210 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $39 $198