Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Olympus FE-25 front
Portability
98
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released January 2009
Olympus FE-25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 0
  • No Video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Kodak M340 versus Olympus FE-25, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M340 (10MP) and the FE-25 (10MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The M340 was brought out within a month of the FE-25 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the M340 matches up against the FE-25 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Olympus FE-25

 M340 FE-25 
Display dimensions2.7"2.4"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k112kSharper display (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Kodak M340

 FE-25 M340 

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Olympus FE-25

 M340 FE-25 
RevealedJanuary 2009January 2009Similar generation
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M340 features external dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) and the Olympus FE-25 has dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M340 versus Olympus FE-25 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the M340 versus the FE-25.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M340 and FE-25 is 96 and 98 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M340 and FE-25.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you might want to take the production date of the products into consideration.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M340
Portrait photography with Olympus FE-25
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Street photography camera
Olympus FE-25 as a Street photography camera
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
maximum ISO low (0)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 Sports photography highlights
Olympus FE-25 Sports photography highlights
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
16
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 Travel photography features
Olympus FE-25 Travel photography features
51
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
61
flash built-in
good max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus FE-25 as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
27
good max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
screen is small (2.4 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M340
Vlogging with Olympus FE-25
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
9
no video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M340 vs Olympus FE-25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Olympus FE-25
 Kodak EasyShare M340Olympus FE-25
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M340 Olympus FE-25
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-05 2009-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Highest resolution 3664 x 2748 3648 x 2768
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 5 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) ()
Max aperture f/3.1-5.7 -
Macro focus distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.4 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 112k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 115 gr (0.25 lb) -
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Launch price $130 $15