Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Updated by Olympus TG-870
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Kodak M340 versus Olympus TG-860, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M340 was released 7 years before the TG-860 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the M340 matches up versus the TG-860 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Olympus TG-860

 M340 TG-860 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Kodak M340

 TG-860 M340 
ReleasedFebruary 2015January 2009Newer by 74 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Olympus TG-860

 M340 TG-860 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Kodak M340 enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M340 versus Olympus TG-860 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the M340 compared to the TG-860.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and TG-860 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and TG-860.

Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-860 to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged M340 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M340
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-860
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
35
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography information
Olympus TG-860 Street photography information
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
69
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
weather sealing
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M340
Sports photography with Olympus TG-860
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
48
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 Travel photography features
Olympus TG-860 Travel photography features
51
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
71
weather sealing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (21mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-860 as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
47
quite wide (21mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-860 Vlogging details
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone socket
33
quite wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M340 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Olympus TG-860
 Kodak EasyShare M340Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M340 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
Category Ultracompact Waterproof
Introduced 2009-01-05 2015-02-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3664 x 2748 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 64 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 5 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 21-105mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus distance 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Yes
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 115g (0.25 pounds) 224g (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $130 $279