Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110
96 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M340 (10MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M340 was introduced 3 years before the VG-110 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M340 scores vs the VG-110 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M340 and Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M340 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Olympus VG-110
| M340 | VG-110 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Kodak M340
| VG-110 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Common features in the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-110
| M340 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 provides outer dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has proportions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the M340 compared to the VG-110.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and VG-110 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and VG-110.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VG-110 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older M340 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M340 | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M340 | Olympus VG-110 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-05 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2748 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 5 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.7 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 115 gr (0.25 lbs) | 105 gr (0.23 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 170 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $130 | $150 |