Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Olympus VG-110 front
Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2009
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M340 (10MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M340 was introduced 3 years before the VG-110 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M340 scores vs the VG-110 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Olympus VG-110

 M340 VG-110 

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Kodak M340

 VG-110 M340 
LaunchedFebruary 2011January 2009More recent by 25 months

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-110

 M340 VG-110 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 provides outer dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has proportions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the M340 compared to the VG-110.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and VG-110 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and VG-110.

Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VG-110 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older M340 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography highlights
19
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
26
supports face detect focus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography factors
Olympus VG-110 Street photography factors
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M340
Sports photography with Olympus VG-110
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
24
supports tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (170 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Travel photography camera
51
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
57
has built in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery (170 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 Landscape photography info
Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography info
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse function
27
pretty wide (27mm)
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
not so great battery (170 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic port
28
pretty wide (27mm)
supports face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-110
 Kodak EasyShare M340Olympus VG-110
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M340 Olympus VG-110
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-05 2011-02-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2748 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 5 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 115 gr (0.25 lbs) 105 gr (0.23 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 170 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $130 $150