Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Olympus VG-145 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2009
Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Kodak M340 versus Olympus VG-145, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and VG-145 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The M340 was manufactured 3 years prior to the VG-145 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the M340 scores against the VG-145 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Olympus VG-145

 M340 VG-145 

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Kodak M340

 VG-145 M340 
LaunchedJuly 2011January 2009More recent by 31 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-145

 M340 VG-145 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M340 versus Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M340 vs the VG-145.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and VG-145 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and VG-145.

As you have seen, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-145 to give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older M340 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VG-145 Portrait photography factors
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography information
Olympus VG-145 Street photography information
47
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 Sports photography information
Olympus VG-145 Sports photography information
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
26
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (160 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VG-145 as a Travel photography camera
51
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
62
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (160 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M340
Landscape photography with Olympus VG-145
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
36
really wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3")
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery pack (160 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VG-145 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic support
28
really wide (26mm)
offers face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic port
Photography Glossary

Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-145
 Kodak EasyShare M340Olympus VG-145
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M340 Olympus VG-145
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-05 2011-07-27
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3664 x 2748 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 5 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.40 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 115 gr (0.25 pounds) 120 gr (0.26 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 160 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $130 $0