Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145
96 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Kodak M340 versus Olympus VG-145, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and VG-145 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M340 was manufactured 3 years prior to the VG-145 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the M340 scores against the VG-145 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M340 & Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are available at Kodak M340 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Olympus VG-145
| M340 | VG-145 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Kodak M340
| VG-145 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak M340 and Olympus VG-145
| M340 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M340 versus Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M340 vs the VG-145.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and VG-145 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and VG-145.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-145 to give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older M340 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak M340 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M340 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M340 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-05 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3664 x 2748 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 5 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 115 gr (0.25 pounds) | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7001 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $0 |