Kodak M340 vs Panasonic FS12

On this page, we are evaluating the Kodak M340 vs Panasonic FS12, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the M340 (10MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The M340 was launched 3 months prior to the FS12 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the M340 matches up against the FS12 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M340 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M340 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.

If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M340 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Panasonic FS12 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M340 vs Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the M340 against the FS12.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and FS12 is 96 and 95 respectively.

In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M340 and FS12.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Panasonic FS12 to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively.