Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released January 2009
Sony T90
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
  • Launched February 2009
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 Overview

The following is a detailed comparison of the Kodak M340 vs Sony T90, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. The sensor resolution of the M340 (10MP) and the T90 (12MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The M340 was launched about the same time to the T90 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M340 grades against the T90 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Sony T90

 M340 T90 

Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Kodak M340

 T90 M340 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Sony T90

 M340 T90 
LaunchedJanuary 2009February 2009Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Sony T90 has proportions of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") having a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the M340 against the T90.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M340 and T90 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M340 and T90.

As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony T90 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony T90 as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
27
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography info
Sony T90 Street photography info
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than average in class (148 grams)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 Sports photography advice
Sony T90 Sports photography advice
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Travel photography camera
Sony T90 as a Travel photography camera
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
51
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (148 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M340
Landscape photography with Sony T90
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
37
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Vlogging camera
Sony T90 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
27
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
heavier than average in class (148g)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Kodak M340 vs Sony T90 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Sony T90
 Kodak EasyShare M340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-05 2009-02-17
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3664 x 2748 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 5 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 115 grams (0.25 pounds) 148 grams (0.33 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $130 $259