Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
30
Overall
33

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Kodak M340 and Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. The resolution of the M340 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The M340 was introduced at a similar time to the T900 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the M340 scores versus the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Sony T900

 M340 T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Kodak M340

 T900 M340 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display dimensions3.5"2.7"Larger display (+0.8")
Display resolution922k230kCrisper display (+692k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Sony T900

 M340 T900 
LaunchedJanuary 2009February 2009Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M340 offers exterior dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M340 and Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the M340 against the T900.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and T900 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M340 and T900.

As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony T900 to produce greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 Portrait photography highlights
Sony T900 Portrait photography highlights
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
27
focusing manually
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Street photography camera
Sony T900 as a Street photography camera
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 Sports photography factors
Sony T900 Sports photography factors
16
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 Travel photography information
Sony T900 Travel photography information
51
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
52
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
37
focusing manually
big screen (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M340
Vlogging with Sony T900
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone jack
28
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M340 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Sony T900
 Kodak EasyShare M340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-05 2009-02-17
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3664 x 2748 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 5 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1000s
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 115g (0.25 lbs) 143g (0.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $130 $300