Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
27
Overall
33

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Sony T99
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
  • Introduced July 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Kodak M340 and Sony T99, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and T99 (14MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M340 was revealed 18 months before the T99 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the M340 matches up against the T99 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Sony T99

 M340 T99 

Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Kodak M340

 T99 M340 
IntroducedJuly 2010January 2009More recent by 18 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Sony T99

 M340 T99 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M340 enjoys external dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Sony T99 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M340 and Sony T99 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the M340 compared to the T99.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and T99 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and T99.

Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Sony T99 to give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older M340 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M340
Portrait photography with Sony T99
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography advice
Sony T99 Street photography advice
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
57
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 Sports photography advice
Sony T99 Sports photography advice
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
35
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250s)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 Travel photography factors
Sony T99 Travel photography factors
51
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
65
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
missing Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 Landscape photography information
Sony T99 Landscape photography information
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
42
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 Vlogging features
Sony T99 Vlogging features
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
31
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M340 vs Sony T99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Sony T99
 Kodak EasyShare M340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-05 2010-07-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3664 x 2748 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 5 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focusing distance 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1250s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 115 gr (0.25 pounds) 121 gr (0.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $130 $179