Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sony TX100V
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
  • Released January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Kodak M340 versus Sony TX100V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and TX100V (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M340 was brought out 24 months prior to the TX100V making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M340 grades versus the TX100V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Sony TX100V

 M340 TX100V 

Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Kodak M340

 TX100V M340 
ReleasedJanuary 2011January 2009Newer by 24 months
Display sizing3.5"2.7"Larger display (+0.8")
Display resolution1229k230kClearer display (+999k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Sony TX100V

 M340 TX100V 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Kodak M340 has got external measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Sony TX100V has specifications of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M340 versus Sony TX100V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the M340 against the TX100V.

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and TX100V is 96 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The pic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M340 and TX100V.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony TX100V to offer you more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged M340 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony TX100V as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
30
good resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M340
Street photography with Sony TX100V
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch focus
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M340
Sports photography with Sony TX100V
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
39
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M340
Travel photography with Sony TX100V
51
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
65
offers touch focus
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (147g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M340
Landscape photography with Sony TX100V
22
manual focus not available
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
43
relatively wide (25mm)
very good size screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Vlogging camera
Sony TX100V as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone support
32
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no microphone socket
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M340 vs Sony TX100V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Sony TX100V
 Kodak EasyShare M340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-05 2011-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2748 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 5 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.7 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focusing distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3.5"
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 2s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 115 gr (0.25 lb) 147 gr (0.32 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $130 $380