Clicky

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
 
Olympus FE-25 front
Portability
98
Imaging
32
Features
11
Overall
23

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 Key Specs

Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Launched July 2009
Olympus FE-25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 0
  • No Video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
  • Launched January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Kodak M341 and Olympus FE-25, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M341 (12MP) and the FE-25 (10MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The M341 was manufactured 7 months later than the FE-25 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the M341 scores vs the FE-25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Olympus FE-25

 M341 FE-25 
LaunchedJuly 2009January 2009More recent by 7 months
Screen size3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution230k112kCrisper screen (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Kodak M341

 FE-25 M341 

Common features in the Kodak M341 and Olympus FE-25

 M341 FE-25 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M341 enjoys exterior measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus FE-25 has dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M341 and Olympus FE-25 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M341 compared to the FE-25.

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M341 and FE-25 is 96 and 98 respectively.

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M341 and FE-25.

Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Kodak M341 to result in more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent M341 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 sensor size comparison

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M341
Portrait photography with Olympus FE-25
20
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M341
Street photography with Olympus FE-25
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
48
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
low max ISO (0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M341 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus FE-25 as a Sports photography camera
17
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
16
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M341 Travel photography info
Olympus FE-25 Travel photography info
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
61
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
low MP (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M341
Landscape photography with Olympus FE-25
27
screen is a good size (3 inches)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
26
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
tiny screen (2.4 inches)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M341 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus FE-25 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
9
no video shooting
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M341 vs Olympus FE-25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M341 and Olympus FE-25
 Kodak EasyShare M341Olympus FE-25
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M341 Olympus FE-25
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-07-29 2009-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2768
Max native ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) ()
Max aperture f/3.0-4.8 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.4 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 112 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 135 grams (0.30 lb) -
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7003 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $130 $15