Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FP1

Its time to look a little more closely at the Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FP1, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. The resolution of the M341 (12MP) and the FP1 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M341 was manufactured 5 months prior to the FP1 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the M341 matches up vs the FP1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M341 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M341 Gallery & Panasonic FP1 Gallery.

If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M341 provides exterior measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP1 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check the Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FP1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M341 vs the FP1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M341 and FP1 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Typically, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M341 and FP1.

As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of files however you should always factor the launch date of the products into consideration.