Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FP8

Lets take a closer look at the Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FP8, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the M341 (12MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M341 was announced within a month of the FP8 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M341 matches up versus the FP8 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M341 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M341 Gallery and Panasonic FP8 Gallery.

If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak M341 provides exterior dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP8 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check the Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FP8 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the M341 versus the FP8.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M341 and FP8 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Quite often, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M341 and FP8.

Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you might want to consider the release date of the cameras into account.