Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FS12

On this page, we are evaluating the Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FS12, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Panasonic. The resolution of the M341 (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M341 was revealed 4 months later than the FS12 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the M341 matches up against the FS12 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M341 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are provided at Kodak M341 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak M341 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check the Kodak M341 vs Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the M341 vs the FS12.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M341 and FS12 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M341 and FS12.

To sum up, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of files although you should consider the launch date of the products into consideration.