Kodak M341 vs Sony W320

The following is a thorough analysis of the Kodak M341 vs Sony W320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. The image resolution of the M341 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M341 was brought out 5 months before the W320 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M341 grades against the W320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M341 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M341 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M341 features external measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M341 vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the M341 and the W320.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M341 and W320 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M341 and W320.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony W320 to offer you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively.