Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000

Portability
81
Imaging
63
Features
83
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Revealed August 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju 9000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 9000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and 9000 (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 IV was manufactured 11 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 IV grades against the 9000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus 9000

 E-M10 IV 9000 
LaunchedAugust 2020May 2009Fresher by 137 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 9000 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 9000

 E-M10 IV 9000 

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 IV against the 9000.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and 9000 is 81 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and 9000.

To sum up, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide more detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography advice
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography advice
77
focusing manually
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography information
Olympus 9000 Street photography information
84
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
offers focus by touch
good ISO range (25,600)
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than average in class (225g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography info
Olympus 9000 Sports photography info
73
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
no phase detect AF
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography features
Olympus 9000 Travel photography features
85
connects via bluetooth
offers focus by touch
good megapixels (20MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
58
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
83
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
32
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging factors
Olympus 9000 Vlogging factors
78
selfie friendly display
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
missing microphone jack
27
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (225g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 9000
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called as - mju 9000
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2020-08-04 2009-05-14
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 50
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-280mm (10.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.7 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 5.00 m
Flash options Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383 gr (0.84 pounds) 225 gr (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $699 $300