Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Kodak M380 and Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the M380 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M380 was released 8 years prior to the TG-870 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the M380 scores vs the TG-870 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M380 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M380 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Olympus TG-870
| M380 | TG-870 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Kodak M380
| TG-870 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 85 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M380 and Olympus TG-870
| M380 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M380 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak M380 and Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the M380 vs the TG-870.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M380 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M380 and TG-870.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older M380 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M380 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M380 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-190mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1448 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $160 | $280 |
