Kodak M380 vs Panasonic FP8

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Kodak M380 and Panasonic FP8, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the M380 (10MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M380 was introduced 6 months prior to the FP8 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the M380 scores versus the FP8 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M380 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M380 Gallery & Panasonic FP8 Gallery.

For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M380 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FP8 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M380 and Panasonic FP8 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the M380 and the FP8.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M380 and FP8 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M380 and FP8.

Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Panasonic FP8 to show more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.